U.S. Supreme Court ruling establishes that SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated persons are “patent eligible” and can become the inventor’s property | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED X-Frame-Options: DENY X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

U.S. Supreme Court ruling establishes that SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated persons are “patent eligible” and can become the inventor’s property

A 2013 Supreme Court ruling involving a prominent genetic testing company set the bar, allowing synthetically created DNA to be patented.

The decision planted a seed, establishing precedence for the patent eligibility of synthetically created DNA, also known as cDNA, which contains elements of naturally occurring DNA along with segments that do not code for protein.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas delivered his opinion to the court in mid-June 2013. Addressing the patent eligibility of cDNA, Justice Thomas concluded on the court’s behalf that the naturally occurring DNA segment is a “product of nature,” and therefore, it is not patent-eligible. Still, scientists have already isolated it, which means naturally occurring DNA can not be patented. Nevertheless, the kicker is that cDNA is patent-eligible because it’s not naturally befalling. This is how they usurp law.

“A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is naturally occurring,” court-held verbiage reveals—the trick which allows the sidestep.

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA